Stanford Root

Schedule

Stanford Root

Schedule

PHIL 176T

Moral Responsibility & Free Will (PHIL 276T)

UNITS:4
GRADING:Letter or Credit/No Credit
LEVEL:Undergrad
GER:—

Grad students enroll in PHIL 276T. Do we have free will? What are the relevant senses of "freedom" and "the will"? One of the main reasons questions about free will matter is that some sort of freedom or control seems to be required in order to fairly hold people responsible for how they have behaved -- for praise and blame, rewards and punishments, and the like. Accordingly, questions about free will often transform into questions about moral responsibility. Are we ever morally responsible for our behavior? Do we deserve credit or rewards for our success or hard work? Do wrongdoers deserve to be blamed or punished? In this course we will explore debates from roughly the past PHIL 100 years between philosophers who defend the common sense view that we do have free will and are sometimes morally responsible for our conduct and philosophers who argue that we do not have free will or are not morally responsible for our behavior. In turn, we will explore practical applications of these debates, such as reasons to change (or not) our social practices and ways of relating to one another, such as the kinds of angry blame that are commonplace in ordinary relationships, and the role of incarceration and punishment in our legal system.

Syllabus not available for this section

Sections

0 Terms
No sections available.

PHIL 176T: Moral Responsibility & Free Will (PHIL 276T)

4 units · Letter or Credit/No Credit

Grad students enroll in 276T. Do we have free will? What are the relevant senses of "freedom" and "the will"? One of the main reasons questions about free will matter is that some sort of freedom or control seems to be required in order to fairly hold people responsible for how they have behaved -- for praise and blame, rewards and punishments, and the like. Accordingly, questions about free will often transform into questions about moral responsibility. Are we ever morally responsible for our behavior? Do we deserve credit or rewards for our success or hard work? Do wrongdoers deserve to be blamed or punished? In this course we will explore debates from roughly the past 100 years between philosophers who defend the common sense view that we do have free will and are sometimes morally responsible for our conduct and philosophers who argue that we do not have free will or are not morally responsible for our behavior. In turn, we will explore practical applications of these debates, such as reasons to change (or not) our social practices and ways of relating to one another, such as the kinds of angry blame that are commonplace in ordinary relationships, and the role of incarceration and punishment in our legal system.

More PHIL courses

  • PHIL 174L: Justice Across Borders (ETHICSOC 174L)
  • PHIL 175W: Philosophy of Law: Protest, Punishment, and Racial Justice (CSRE 175W, ETHICSOC 175W, PHIL 275W, POLISCI 137, POLISCI 337)
  • PHIL 176: Political Philosophy: The Social Contract Tradition (ETHICSOC 176, PHIL 276, POLISCI 137A, POLISCI 337A)
  • PHIL 176A: Classical Seminar: Origins of Political Thought (CLASSICS 181, CLASSICS 381, ETHICSOC 130A, PHIL 276A, POLISCI 230A, POLISCI 330A)
  • PHIL 176L: That Mortal God: Deifying the Political in Early Modern Politics (JEWISHST 176L, JEWISHST 276L, PHIL 276L, RELIGST 176X)
  • PHIL 176P: Democratic Theory (ETHICSOC 234, POLISCI 234)
  • PHIL 176W: Law and Philosophy Workshop (PHIL 276W)
  • PHIL 178: Ethics in Society Honors Seminar (ETHICSOC 190)
  • PHIL 179B: Feminist Ethics (FEMGEN 179B, PHIL 279B)
  • PHIL 179R: Feminist Philosophy (FEMGEN 179R, PHIL 279R)
  • PHIL 180: Metaphysics (PHIL 280)
  • PHIL 181A: Philosophy of Language (PHIL 281A)

All PHIL courses · All departments