Stanford Root

Schedule

Stanford Root

Schedule

PHIL 194E

Capstone Seminar: When Bad People Create Beautiful Things

UNITS:4
GRADING:Letter or Credit/No Credit
LEVEL:Undergrad
GER:—

Capstone seminar for undergrad majors. Much of the art we love was created by people who did awful things. We are left to contend with whether we can separate our moral judgement of the artist from our aesthetic appreciation of their work. Can artists' moral transgressions render their creations inconsumable? Does the terribleness of someone's beliefs or actions diminish the greatness of their work? Or, to the contrary, can genius attenuate monstrousness? Is creating great art worth harming people for? We will also consider our moral and political responsibility as consumers of art. Is it wrong to like art by bad people? When, if ever, ought we to boycott someone's art, and does it matter whether withholding our money or our attention makes a difference? What does consistency require? More generally, is there anything wrong with judging people from the past by standards of the present? And, broadening our vision, what should we think about some of those giants who defined our field, who expressed views we find abhorrent - and on whose shoulders we stand?

Syllabus for selected term:
View Autumn 2026 Syllabus

Sections

1 Term
Seminar 1Open
ID: 25867
0 / 20 enrolled
DAYS:Tuesday
TIME:3 PM – 5:50 PM
LOCATION:200-107
INSTRUCTOR:
Eggert, Linda
4units

PHIL 194E: Capstone Seminar: When Bad People Create Beautiful Things

4 units · Letter or Credit/No Credit

Capstone seminar for undergrad majors. Much of the art we love was created by people who did awful things. We are left to contend with whether we can separate our moral judgement of the artist from our aesthetic appreciation of their work. Can artists' moral transgressions render their creations inconsumable? Does the terribleness of someone's beliefs or actions diminish the greatness of their work? Or, to the contrary, can genius attenuate monstrousness? Is creating great art worth harming people for? We will also consider our moral and political responsibility as consumers of art. Is it wrong to like art by bad people? When, if ever, ought we to boycott someone's art, and does it matter whether withholding our money or our attention makes a difference? What does consistency require? More generally, is there anything wrong with judging people from the past by standards of the present? And, broadening our vision, what should we think about some of those giants who defined our field, who expressed views we find abhorrent - and on whose shoulders we stand?

Offered in Autumn 2026 at Stanford University.

Autumn 2026 sections

  • Seminar — Tuesday 3:00 PM – 5:50 PM — 200-107 — Eggert, Linda (Undergrad)

More PHIL courses

  • PHIL 187: Philosophy of Action (PHIL 287)
  • PHIL 187B: Responsibility and the Criminal Law (PHIL 287B)
  • PHIL 187C: Thinking and Acting Together (PHIL 287C)
  • PHIL 188A: Explanation (PHIL 288A)
  • PHIL 193C: Film & Philosophy (ENGLISH 154F, FRENCH 154, ITALIAN 154)
  • PHIL 194A: Capstone seminar: Imagination in Fiction and Philosophy
  • PHIL 194F: Capstone seminar: Beauty and Other Forms of Value
  • PHIL 194J: Capstone Seminar: Other Minds
  • PHIL 196: Honors Tutorial, Senior Year
  • PHIL 197: Individual Work, Undergraduate
  • PHIL 199: Seminar for Prospective Honors Students
  • PHIL 207B: Plato's Later Metaphysics and Epistemology (PHIL 107B)

All PHIL courses · All departments