Stanford Root

Schedule

Stanford Root

Schedule

PHIL 276T

Moral Responsibility & Free Will (PHIL 176T)

UNITS:4
GRADING:Letter or Credit/No Credit
LEVEL:Graduate
GER:—

Grad students enroll in PHIL 276T. Do we have free will? What are the relevant senses of "freedom" and "the will"? One of the main reasons questions about free will matter is that some sort of freedom or control seems to be required in order to fairly hold people responsible for how they have behaved -- for praise and blame, rewards and punishments, and the like. Accordingly, questions about free will often transform into questions about moral responsibility. Are we ever morally responsible for our behavior? Do we deserve credit or rewards for our success or hard work? Do wrongdoers deserve to be blamed or punished? In this course we will explore debates from roughly the past PHIL 100 years between philosophers who defend the common sense view that we do have free will and are sometimes morally responsible for our conduct and philosophers who argue that we do not have free will or are not morally responsible for our behavior. In turn, we will explore practical applications of these debates, such as reasons to change (or not) our social practices and ways of relating to one another, such as the kinds of angry blame that are commonplace in ordinary relationships, and the role of incarceration and punishment in our legal system.

Syllabus not available for this section

Sections

0 Terms
No sections available.

PHIL 276T: Moral Responsibility & Free Will (PHIL 176T)

4 units · Letter or Credit/No Credit

Grad students enroll in 276T. Do we have free will? What are the relevant senses of "freedom" and "the will"? One of the main reasons questions about free will matter is that some sort of freedom or control seems to be required in order to fairly hold people responsible for how they have behaved -- for praise and blame, rewards and punishments, and the like. Accordingly, questions about free will often transform into questions about moral responsibility. Are we ever morally responsible for our behavior? Do we deserve credit or rewards for our success or hard work? Do wrongdoers deserve to be blamed or punished? In this course we will explore debates from roughly the past 100 years between philosophers who defend the common sense view that we do have free will and are sometimes morally responsible for our conduct and philosophers who argue that we do not have free will or are not morally responsible for our behavior. In turn, we will explore practical applications of these debates, such as reasons to change (or not) our social practices and ways of relating to one another, such as the kinds of angry blame that are commonplace in ordinary relationships, and the role of incarceration and punishment in our legal system.

More PHIL courses

  • PHIL 273A: Moral Psychology (PHIL 173A)
  • PHIL 273C: Topics in Metaethics: Moral Error Theory (PHIL 173C)
  • PHIL 274: Ethics Beyond Consequences (PHIL 174)
  • PHIL 275W: Philosophy of Law: Protest, Punishment, and Racial Justice (CSRE 175W, ETHICSOC 175W, PHIL 175W, POLISCI 137, POLISCI 337)
  • PHIL 276: Political Philosophy: The Social Contract Tradition (ETHICSOC 176, PHIL 176, POLISCI 137A, POLISCI 337A)
  • PHIL 276A: Classical Seminar: Origins of Political Thought (CLASSICS 181, CLASSICS 381, ETHICSOC 130A, PHIL 176A, POLISCI 230A, POLISCI 330A)
  • PHIL 276W: Law and Philosophy Workshop (PHIL 176W)
  • PHIL 279B: Feminist Ethics (FEMGEN 179B, PHIL 179B)
  • PHIL 279R: Feminist Philosophy (FEMGEN 179R, PHIL 179R)
  • PHIL 280: Metaphysics (PHIL 180)
  • PHIL 281A: Philosophy of Language (PHIL 181A)
  • PHIL 281B: Topics in Philosophy of Language (PHIL 181B)

All PHIL courses · All departments